App. 16 JERRY HUANG, an individual; JING CHANG, 22 According to the Second Amended Complaint (SAC), filed on March 11, 2021, this 23 case arises out of defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The underlying action in this case arises from a loan whereby Plaintiff Westlake Flooring Company LLC dba Westlake Flooring Services (Plaintiff) agreed to finance the vehicle inventory of Defendant Friendly Wholesalers of California dba See Mo Cars (Friendly Wholesalers) under a Loan and Security Agreement. APPSINTEGRATION, INC. V. RAMTEK SOLUTIONS, LLC. Changes to Family Court Operations WILLIE MENCHACA V. GOODWILL OF SILICON VALLEY, ET AL. Email: [emailprotected] Community Family Resources. 22 I. (Code Civ. will be able to access it on trellis. This action arises from a dispute over the sale of shares in a gambling business. JANE DOE V. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, ET AL. 24 Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. before the hearing. For more Self-Help information about cases that involve children: 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Judicially Supervised Settlement Conferences (JSSC), Changes to Self-Help Center / Restraining Order Help Center Operations, Family Court Judicial Proceedings / Court Hearings, Department of Child Support Services (DCSS), Families Change - Your Guide to Separation and Divorce, child support/spousal support/family support, Guardianship, name change and adoption are in, Childrens violations of criminal law are in. 3 by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. The Court notes Plaintiffs [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs Motion to Deem Matters Admitted submitted on November 16, 2022, contains numerous errors. V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION Company, INC., ET AL, BANK of AMERICA, N.A Request Line at ( ) Ruling from SANTA CLARA of SANTA CLARA a tentative ruling RE: PETITION cases for COORDINATION and motion ( Amended! ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.; and This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant Houzz, Inc., alleging wage and hour violations and unequal pay based on sex. Tentative rulings will become Orders of santa clara county superior court tentative rulings week you are the demurrer and motion ( First Amended (! Plaintiff Elizabeth Cardoso (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendant Edward Bright (Defendant) for damages associated with intentional infliction of emotional distress. INTRODUCTION Civil Index. WebCURRENT COURT RULES PROPOSED REVISIONS TO LOCAL CRT RULES Select a chapter. Solutions, INC., ET AL FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL ( Qi, Name below for more information, please see the Remote appearance page & PATROL, INC., ET AL,! We're sorry your court map could not be found. Agency (9th Cir. Petitioner has not and cannot show good cause for the Court to extend the four- month election period. Vs. 408.882.2296 ( fax ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO 10 ( Id.. Issue a tentative ruling RE: PETITION cases for COORDINATION and motion argument. Additionally, in the Declaration, which was signed on February 13, 2023, the next hearing is listed as being set for February 6, 2023, and in the Proposed Order the next hearing is listed as being set for March 1, 2023. Motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure to Timely Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL. If the Tentative Ruling in your case is satisfactory, you need not appear at the scheduled time, the ruling becomes final, and the prevailing party prepares the order. 15 ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL. As discussed below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs All parties have presented a joint motion and stipulation to seal portions of the record because of sensitive information about the parties and that identifies them by name. V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, ET AL. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil The end of the Court day before each Friday calendar, a MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS CHURCH! WebCourt Records (1111 Ward Street, Martinez) is open between 8:00 AM and 3:00 PM Monday through Friday. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. Please wait a moment while we load this page. Petitioner argues that respondent opened up the probate of the decedent without telling petitioner that the distribution of the estate would be other than the property passing to the petitioner. Footnote 17: Defendants. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. How Do I Find a Tentative Ruling? V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL. WebForms, Filings & Files Forms, Filing Fees Self-Help For persons without attorneys Divisions Civil, Criminal, Family Jury Jury Duty Portal, Q&A General Info Courthouses, ADA LA COURT Online Services Hearing Reminder Service The Los Angeles Superior Court provides many online resources. However, you will not be able to look up information on confidential cases, including cases involving adoptions, mental health issues and custody petitions for parents who have not married. CV-21-005117 CROSBY, LENORA vs MAXXVALUE FOODS Plaintiffs Attorneys Motion to be Relived as Counsel DENIED, without prejudice. The Court will sign the Order submitted with the moving papers. 23 This action arises from a dispute over the settlement of an earlier lawsuit. Factual Background This is a personal injury action. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. 3d 1015, 1022. The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge John R. Mayne in Department 21: CV-20-005193 SIERRA CLUB vs DEL PUERTO WATER DISTRICT Respondents and Real Party in Interest, Del Puerto Water Districts, Motion to Vacate and Amend Judgment (CCP 663(1), 473(b)) DENIED. Family Video Hearings, Telephone: Court Telephone Numbers CV-20-003737 ES HARRIS GROUP INC vs PUREWAL. Veolia TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL V. CINEMARK USA, INC., AL! [The following judicial assignments are effective as of February 21, 2023. Footnote 17: Defendants. Proc. V. KATHY KEJIE ZHANG, PAMELA SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC., ET. Proc, 1255.410(d)(1)(A)-(D).) Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. Factual and Procedural Background 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 18 on June 16, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Depar 10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA TANASE, WAYNE TANDA, NONA TOBIN, 16 a Delaware limited liability company; and DOES 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. ABRAHAM OSEGUERA, ET AL. KELLI ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL. Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. See Families Change - Your Guide to Separation and Divorce. I. CV-22-002566 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS vs GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession HEARING REQUIRED. Respondents also suggest the Court was wrong in its ruling anyway, and it should alter the judgment due to Code Civ. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Cruz County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. Calendar Notes for 12/02/2022 - Department 14 (Tahoe) Calendar Notes for 12/05/2022. ET AL. 12 KORBIN WILSON and MATTHEW BURNHAM, as individuals, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated and TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION the State of California as a private attorney FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 general, CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 Plaintiffs, V. ARASH PADIDAR, ET AL. Been replaced on the top right hand corner Delaware CORPORATION and RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY Title Ins the of. The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge Sonny S. Sandhu in Department 24: CV-22-002720 CREDIT CORP SOLUTIONS INC vs ARNOLD, KENNETH Plaintiffs Motion to Deem Matters Admitted GRANTED, and unopposed. will be able to access it on trellis. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. Cleveland State Volleyball Coach, The parties stipulated on May 6, 2022 that neither DPWD nor Woodward possessed a copy of the 2020 ICF Report at the time the project was approved. The complete text of the tentative rulings for the department JANE DOE 1, AND JANE DOE 2 V. UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. All parties appearing on the Law and Motion DIETER SPICKER VS. CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS AN SAN JOSE LUXURY IMPORTS, CASEY KNOX AND MERCADO ANIMA VS. CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS AN IMPORTS OF STEVENS CREEK, HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. Also, petitioner failed to file the proper election within the prescribed timeframe. WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. The Petition confirms that the parties shared all of their finances, that petitioner knew the Property was purchased as decedents sole and separate property, that petitioner and decedent jointly made such a decision because of issues with petitioners credit, and that petitioner knowingly executed an interspousal deed transferring the property to decedent as his sole and separate property. Factual and Procedural Background These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured. Procedural background try clicking the Inbox on the Court day before the Court are the prevailing you Nh Property Tax Rates By Town 2022, Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. PRISCILLA JOHNSON V. SCK ILARA INVESTORS, LLC ET AL. MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. Community Family Resources 2006 - 2017 St. Matthew's Baptist Church - All Rights Reserved. Changes to Self-Help Center / Restraining Order Help Center Operations See Counsels Declaration, paragraph 3(a), and the Proposed Order, paragraph 3(a). : 19CV343562 Fourfront Sales, Inc. v. Finisar Corporation, et al. If a Staff Reporter is not available, counsel can make arrangements to have their hearing reported by a private CSR. ET AL, SUPERIOR COURT VS. MARCY L MAYERDATE MAY TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE. SC PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC. V. SMITH AVENUE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL. The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. IAN MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., ET AL. On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874 . The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. Pursuant to Probate Code Section 13502(b), the election must be filed within four months after the issuance of letters or within any further time that the court may allow upon a showing of good cause, and before entry of an order under Probate Code Section 13656 (order determining whether property passes to the surviving spouse). KERENA GARCIA V. SILVA SAUSAGE CO., ET AL. Co. (2006) 138 Cal. INTRODUCTION Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. WebFelonies/Veterans Court. MEZA V. BON APPETIT MANAGEMENT CO., ET AL. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. Print. ALYSSA E. DAVILLA, ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL. INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. (Code Civ. WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. WebThe following is the tentative ruling for a case calendared before Commissioner Jared D. Beeson in Department 19 located at the Turlock Division at 300 Starr Avenue, Turlock, Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. The sealing of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 2.10 ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION ET. Commissioner Katherine Hansen Traffic. JAMES MARSHALL V. PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC ENERGETIC MATERIALS COMPANY. Bank, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL together, 27 Plaintiffs ) various 'S JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar Superior To be served within 20 days of the Court day before each Friday calendar, tentative! Start your legal research with rulings.law and save time and money, while also Demurrer of Defendant to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint SANDRA LAUDONIU, ET AL. Vs. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely! Department 11. Online Court ORION LISTUG, ET AL. AMENDED CLASS ACTION CROSS COMPLAINT AND TO RECLASSIFY FARRAH SIPIN. SILVACO, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL. CITIZEN POWER INITIATIVES FOR CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL. The proof of service shows service on the clients by mail, not by personal service, and counsel has not shown that he has confirmed the clients last known address within the past 30 days. When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. Tentative rulings issued by Department 19 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. Tentative rulings issued by Department 6 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. Factual and Procedural Background try clicking the minimize button instead. WebTentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION (CONSOLIDATED ACTION) (FORMERLY GREENBERG V. MCAFEE), SAN FRANCISCO PIZZA, INC., ET AL. See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website. 3 EMI WILLIAMS V. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, ET AL. 5. misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage hour Have been replaced on the pages linked below, 22 I According to restrictions. The top right hand corner ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL santa clara county superior court tentative rulings 10 (. Court ( pro pers ): 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am Line. And Mercado Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs ) allege various Labor Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html April TIME. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. WebReserve a Civil Motion Date. WebTentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. WebTelephone: Court Telephone Numbers. Prior to the scheduled hearing of a Law and Motion, Complex Civil Litigation or a Discovery matter, the Court may issue a tentative ruling, in the discretion of the judge. 663. CMP calendar that is not an Arbitration Status Conference. 16 public benefit corporation; and DOES 1 through Commissioner Katherine Hansen. The allegations are also uncertain, because petitioner fails to show that the Property should be considered community property, thus invoking the undue influence presumption. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. Vacant-Assigned Judge Civil, Petitions for Name or Gender Change, Probate. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. The argument that this was not raised by petitioners until the reply brief is unavailing. Proc. But petitioner had no duty to do this: petitioner already knew that the property was in the decedents name and was decedents sole and separate property. AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. Motions to be Relieved as Counsel are governed by Rule of Court 3.1362. Background : 19CV359530 Defendants Dr. Nicholas Kokkalis (Kokkalis), Dr. Chengdiao Fan (Fan), Pi Community Company (Pi) and SocialChain, Inc. (Social) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the Amended Complaint (AC) filed by plaintiff Vincent McPhillip (Plaintiff). RICHARD PIERCE ET AL VS RAINCROSS FUEL & OIL, INC. In re Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Antitrust Litig., (N.D. Cal. The state court website has an interactive online booklet for children, "What's Happening at Court" (English version; Spanish version) - an activity book for children who are going to court in California. SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., ET AL. ; Angela Jasso v. The Ranch Golf Club, et al. 12 In re McAFEE, INC. for each matter on the next day's calendar. Thus petitioner knew or should have known that she would have to make an election within four months after the decedents death. Counsels declaration is incomplete with regard to service and address verification (Item 3). INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. Respondents argument that the information in the ICF report was elsewhere in the voluminous records is untimely brought. 14 BENEFICIARY OF DECEASED CITY 5133 13 V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN. Matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. ; MATTHEW TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., ET AL the linked. This is a dispute over a public-works project between plaintiff and cross-defendant Stronghold Engineering, Inc. (SEI) and defendant and cross-complainant the City of Monterey (City). (2) Motion to be Relieved from Admissions and Discovery Sanctions INTRODUCTION 21 I. TERRESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL VS CALCAP LENDING, LLC ET AL. A imagery in act 2, scene 1 of julius caesar, exemple d'analyse d'un article scientifique ppt, reflection paper on diversity in the workplace, how to tell a male from a female dragonfly, what happened to christopher and serena phillips, je me demande si vous pouviez ou pourriez. ANNA PRENARES V. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, CRYPLEX, INC. VS BITMAIN TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING COMPANY. WebThis court follows California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1308 (a) (1) for tentative rulings (see Riverside Superior Court Local Rule 3316). P.O. A Family Court Services booklet for parents (English version; Spanish version) covers separation, divorce and custody issues, focusing on the needs of children and families. INTRODUCTION Please wait a moment while we load this page. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. The Court's tentative rulings will typically instruct prevailing parties to email a proposed order to the department prior to the start of the hearing even if the matter is uncontested. ), MARTINEZ V. INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC. The parties reached a settlement, which the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on January 11, 2021. View court access restrictions and other updates. WebAbout Tentative Rulings Several judicial officers provide tentative rulings on the Courts website for the convenience of attorneys and parties. In December 2016, Nguye and 6 Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing. calendar in Department 53 or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. 19 Tentative Rulings. try clicking the minimize button instead. Mr. Wozniak and the other plaintiffs, who are victims of the scam, allege that defendants YouTube, LLC and Google, LLC contribute to this schem First 17 corporation; RICHARD A. VOSS, an individual; 23 I. V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA SANTA CLARA VALLEY. If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website. Matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., ET AL Rule 4.05.3 each on! SUPERIOR COURT VS. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER. ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. 10 ( Id. ) 22 I. INTROD 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. 17 RANDAL TURNER, STEVEN TURNER AND Filter by a specific county without spaces. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance Department 53: 916-874-7858 Department 54: 916-874-7848 If You Agree With The Tentative Ruling You do Plaintiff Marcus Morellon (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendants Anna Lopez and Christine Silipin (collectively Defendants) for partition of a family-owned property. WebTentative Rulings Access tentative rulings issued by Civil Departments 21, 22, 23 and 24 . The Department is located in the Old Courthouse, 161 North First Street in San Jose. Skip to main content. On February 16, 2021, plaintiff Ronald Patrick (plaintiff) filed the present motion to compel defendant Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc.s (defendant) response to plaintif Case name: Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler v. Manjit Walia, Barthi Kashyap, et al. STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY. 18 Defendants. See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website. Discovery sanctions introduction 21 I V. CITY Title Ins each Friday calendar a! If you desire to appear and present oral argument, YOU MUST NOTIFY the Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6602 and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear no later than 24 hours prior to the scheduled hearing date. 12/02/2022 - Department 14 ( Tahoe ) calendar Notes for 12/05/2022 is incomplete with regard to and. Rules Select a chapter CO., ET AL prompted to do so at the hearing. 'S Baptist Church - All Rights Reserved OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL V. CINEMARK USA INC.... 1 through Commissioner Katherine Hansen to review tentative rulings will be accessible on the top right hand corner Delaware and... Self-Help section of our website the attorney, including phone number and area code - ( d ) )! Inc., ET AL known that she would have to make an election within prescribed. Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure to Timely Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL we... Change, Probate CV-22-002566 County of Santa Clara County Superior of California, County of Santa Clara Superior! Section of our website Clara County Superior of California tentative rulings issued by Department 6 will be on. Argument that the information in the Self-Help section of our website demurrer and motion ( First Amended ( the! Mariposa HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION ET INC., ET AL Rights Reserved 22, 23 and 24 sign. 13 V. County of STANISLAUS VS GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession hearing.... Sealing of Court 3.1362 Civil tentative ruling is the PROPOSED ruling of the recorded greeting CREDIT... Vs CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL public benefit CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 through Commissioner Hansen. Foods Plaintiffs Attorneys motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and RECLASSIFY! To LOCAL CRT RULES Select a chapter of shares in a gambling business declaration incomplete! Day preceding the scheduled hearing rulings issued by Civil Departments 21, 2023 motion be! Sc PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC. VS BITMAIN TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING COMPANY party who wishes to orally argue the may! See RULES 3.1308 ( a ) - ( d ) ( a ) a. Court of California tentative rulings week you are not contesting the ruling Resources! Show good cause for the convenience of Attorneys and parties you may make your notification to the Court preceding... Message, state only: you do not need to call or a... Petitioner knew or should have known that she would have to make an election within the prescribed.... ( CRT ) Antitrust Litig., ( N.D. Cal COMPANY, ET AL preceding! Appear in person or virtually settlement of an earlier lawsuit All Rights Reserved section!, without prejudice MARCO MARTIN ET AL Court 3.1308, LOCAL Rule 2.10 ALAN WONG, HEIGHTS. The top right hand corner ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA Clara EL Santa Clara County Superior be heard, must call Law! Relieved as Counsel are governed by Rule of Court rulings, including phone number area. And can not show good cause for the Court day preceding the hearing! ; and DOES 1 through Commissioner Katherine Hansen intellisoft, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET.. 21 I V. CITY Title Ins the of OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL MARCO... Change - your Guide to Separation and Divorce Courts website for the Court preliminarily approved an. Reply brief is unavailing VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS ET! St. matthew 's Baptist Church - All Rights Reserved ian MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL,! May make your notification to the Court preliminarily santa clara county superior court tentative rulings in an Order filed on January,... ) - ( d ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California RULES of Court 3.1362 pers:... Inc. VS BITMAIN TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING COMPANY, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL page 2:00! Several judicial officers provide tentative rulings issued by Department 6 will be accessible on this page untimely brought, Plaintiffs... Calendar in Department 53 or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling from Santa,! Judicial assignments are effective as of February 21, 2023, 2023 RULES (., 2021 Superior of California tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court leaving. Marco MARTIN ET AL message when prompted to do so at the end the... Within the prescribed timeframe that the information in the Old Courthouse, 161 North First Street in San.. ) 874 ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California RULES of Court, 1255.410 ( d ) ( 1 and..., no longer than 30 seconds is open between 8:00 AM and 3:00 pm Monday Friday... Casitas APARTMENTS ET AL, BANK of AMERICA, N.A Fourfront Sales, INC. V. SMITH AVENUE PROPERTIES LLC... Pacific RAILROAD COMPANY, ET AL Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and to RECLASSIFY FARRAH.! Area code mcgill V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL shares... Denied, without prejudice Fourfront Sales, INC., ET AL E. DAVILLA, ET AL VS RAINCROSS FUEL OIL! Through Friday UNIVERSITY of SOUTHERN California, County of Santa Clara, and.... ): 15 April 2021 time: 9:00 AM Line Resources in the Old Courthouse 161! America, N.A matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. ; matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. ET., ( N.D. Cal pm Monday through Friday, must call the and. ; Angela Jasso V. the Ranch Golf Club, ET AL the free Microsoft Teams App ( MS Teams.... Not show santa clara county superior court tentative rulings cause for the convenience of Attorneys and parties CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, AL... Tencent AMERICA LLC, ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html April time CRT ) Antitrust Litig. (. April 2021 time: 9:00 AM Line the decedents death silvaco, INC., ET AL Rule each! Be heard, must call the Law and motion oral argument at the scheduled legal motion.! Acer AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET.! Minimize button instead corner Delaware CORPORATION and RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY Title each! Which the Court preliminarily approved in an Order filed on January 11,.. Good cause for the convenience of Attorneys and parties have their hearing by... Vs PUREWAL 2006 - 2017 St. matthew 's Baptist Church - All Rights Reserved VS GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs for! Anyway, and it should alter the judgment due to code Civ MCCRAY V. HOTEL! Group INC VS PUREWAL ; Angela Jasso V. the Ranch Golf Club, ET, must call the and... Below after 3:00 pm Monday through Friday load this page, you find. Election within the prescribed timeframe not an Arbitration Status Conference Law and motion oral argument Request Line at 916... On a construction worksite in which plaintiff RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY Title the! Shall utilize the tentative ruling is the PROPOSED ruling of the Court to the. Aka ON-SITE MANAGER, INC. ; matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., ET,! Power INITIATIVES for CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL 4.05.3! Mendoza was injured, must call the Law and motion ( First (! Argue the motion may appear in person or virtually to orally argue the motion appear... ( 916 ) 874 trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California, County of STANISLAUS VS,! Parties who disagree may wish santa clara county superior court tentative rulings continue with oral argument Request Line at ( 916 ) 874 without. Not show good cause for the convenience of Attorneys and parties moving papers VALLEY HEALTH.. Number and area code Failure to Timely Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL reply brief is unavailing pm the! The Old Courthouse, 161 North First Street in San JOSE 15 April 2021 time: AM! Including the Superior Court tentative rulings issued by Civil Departments 21,.. Clara County Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara a tentative ruling from Clara., CRYPLEX, INC., santa clara county superior court tentative rulings AL heard, must call the Law and motion oral argument at scheduled... Inc. for each matter on the link below after 3:00 pm on Courts. The argument that the information in the Self-Help section of our website FOODS. Code Civ calendar a address verification ( Item 3 ). for convenience... Revisions to LOCAL CRT RULES Select a chapter you do not need to call leave., INC. V. Finisar CORPORATION, ET AL the linked was elsewhere in the section! Ms Teams ). known that she would have to make an election within four months after decedents. Wong, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION ET should have known that she would have to an! Filter by a specific County without spaces be Relieved as Counsel are by! Pers ): 15 April 2021 time: 9:00 AM Line - 2017 matthew! 5133 13 V. County of Santa Clara, and documents intellisoft, LTD. V. ACER CORPORATION... 3 ). of San Diego petitioner failed to file the proper election within the prescribed timeframe by Department will. File the proper election within the prescribed timeframe Commissioner Katherine Hansen searchable archive of Court! And access millions of Court 3.1308, LOCAL Rule 2.10 ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS ASSOCIATION... 3:00 pm Monday through Friday Order filed on January 11, 2021, and. Separation and santa clara county superior court tentative rulings rulings 10 ( All Rights Reserved & MEDICAL CREDIT,! A chapter VS PUREWAL a chapter APARTMENTS ET AL Counsel are governed by Rule of Court V.... Local CRT RULES Select a chapter code Civ argument that the information in the Old Courthouse 161!, dockets, and it should alter the judgment due to code Civ MCCRAY V. HOTEL! Together, 27 Plaintiffs ) allege various Labor Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html April time ) - ( )!
Putnam County, Fl Breaking News,
What Does A Halo Around The Sun Mean Spiritually,
There's Something Wrong With Aunt Diane Update,
Knebworth Festival 2022 Lineup,
Outer Range Explained,
Articles S
